Famous Casino Cheating Devices: The Gadgets That Tried to Beat the House
Throughout gambling history, cheaters have demonstrated remarkable ingenuity in their attempts to beat the house. From mechanical card-switching devices hidden up sleeves to sophisticated computers that predict where a roulette ball will land, the devices used to cheat casinos read like something from a spy thriller. These gadgets represent a constant technological arms race between cheaters and the casinos determined to stop them.
While possessing or using any of these devices is illegal and will result in criminal prosecution, their stories offer a fascinating glimpse into human creativity—and the lengths some will go to gain an unfair advantage. According to the American Gaming Association, casinos lose an estimated hundreds of millions of dollars annually to various forms of cheating, with device-based fraud representing some of the most sophisticated attempts.
Holdout Machines: Mechanical Card Concealment
The holdout machine, also known as a "bug" or "holdout," is perhaps the oldest category of casino cheating device. These mechanical contraptions were designed to secretly retain cards during play and introduce them back into the game at opportune moments.
The Kepplinger Holdout
Named after its inventor P.J. Kepplinger in the 1880s, this device was hidden under the cheater's coat and attached to pulleys connected to their legs. When the cheater spread their knees apart, a mechanical arm would slide a hidden card into their palm. When they brought their knees together, the card would retract back up their sleeve.
The Kepplinger holdout was revolutionary for its time—completely silent and operated by natural-looking leg movements. According to gambling historians at the UNLV International Gaming Institute, this device was used so successfully in San Francisco gambling halls that when other cheaters finally discovered how it worked, they formed a secret society to share the technique rather than expose it.
The San Francisco Ring
A simpler but equally effective device was the holdout ring—a finger ring with a small clip that could grip a single playing card. Cheaters would palm an ace or king, clip it to the ring, and introduce it into their hand when the timing was right. While less versatile than full mechanical holdouts, these rings were nearly impossible to detect without a physical search.
Card Marking: From Daub to Lasers
Marked cards have been used to cheat since playing cards were invented. The evolution of marking techniques mirrors technological advancement itself, from crude scratches to sophisticated infrared ink systems.
Traditional Marking Methods
Daub: A special paste or ink applied to cards during play that was visible only to the cheater. Early daubers used mixtures that appeared invisible under normal light but revealed themselves through subtle shading differences the cheater trained themselves to recognize.
Scratch Work: Using a fingernail or hidden tool to make tiny scratches or bends on high-value cards. Skilled cheaters could "read" the deck from across the table by feeling for these marks or spotting tiny inconsistencies in how cards reflected light.
Block-Out Work: Adding tiny amounts of white ink to the decorative backs of cards to alter their patterns subtly. A trained eye could instantly identify marked cards, while casual observers saw nothing unusual.
The Infrared Contact Lens System
In the modern era, cheaters developed systems using special ink visible only under infrared light and contact lenses that could see into the infrared spectrum. This system was notably used in cases documented by New Jersey's Division of Gaming Enforcement, where cheaters could see marked cards that were completely invisible to everyone else—including casino surveillance cameras.
The scheme typically worked like this: a corrupt dealer or floor employee would mark cards before they entered play using infrared ink. The cheater, wearing specially manufactured contact lenses, could then see markings indicating each card's value, giving them perfect information about other players' hands. This technique appeared in several high-profile cases including the infamous Phil Ivey edge sorting scandal, though Ivey used the cards' existing imperfections rather than applied markings.
Roulette Prediction Computers
Perhaps no cheating devices are as technologically impressive as roulette prediction computers. These hidden computers attempt to calculate where the ball will land based on physics and timing measurements.
The Eudaemons: When Science Went to Vegas
In the late 1970s, a group of physics graduate students from UC Santa Cruz called "The Eudaemons" built what may have been the first successful roulette computer. Led by J. Doyne Farmer and Norman Packard (who later became pioneers in chaos theory), they created a system using toe-operated switches and a computer hidden in a shoe.
Their approach was based on physics: by timing how long the ball took to complete certain rotations and measuring the wheel's speed, the computer could predict which section of the wheel the ball would land in. The predictions weren't perfect, but they didn't need to be—even a slight edge over the house, consistently applied, would produce profits over time.
"We were young physicists who realized that roulette was actually a physics problem, not a gambling problem. The ball follows Newton's laws—if you can measure the initial conditions accurately enough, you can predict where it will end up." — Description from "The Eudaemonic Pie" by Thomas Bass, documenting the group's experiments
According to research from The Royal Society, published studies have confirmed that roulette prediction is theoretically possible under certain conditions. A 2012 paper demonstrated that with proper measurements, prediction accuracy of up to 18% could be achieved—enough to generate significant profits.
Edward Thorp and Claude Shannon build the first wearable computer, designed for roulette prediction. It used an earpiece to communicate predictions.
The Eudaemons operate their toe-switch computer system in Nevada casinos, achieving modest but consistent profits.
The Ritz Casino in London loses ÂŁ1.3 million ($2.4 million) to a team using laser scanners and mobile phones to predict roulette outcomes. UK courts ruled it wasn't cheating since the gamblers didn't interfere with the wheel.
Modern casinos use countermeasures including "no more bets" calls before the ball decelerates significantly, and special wheels designed to be unpredictable.
Legal Gray Areas
Interestingly, in some jurisdictions, using a roulette computer isn't technically illegal—provided you don't interfere with the wheel itself. The famous 2004 Ritz Casino case in London saw gamblers win £1.3 million using laser-equipped mobile phones to predict outcomes. UK authorities investigated but ultimately declined to prosecute, ruling that since the players hadn't tampered with the wheel, they had simply used skill and technology.
However, Nevada and most US states have made the use of any prediction device explicitly illegal under gaming statutes. The Nevada Gaming Control Board classifies possession of such devices on casino premises as a felony offense.
Slot Machine Cheating Devices
Slot machines have attracted their own category of cheating devices, evolving alongside the machines themselves from mechanical tricks to electronic manipulation.
The Monkey Paw
Invented by legendary slot cheater Tommy Glenn Carmichael, the "monkey paw" was a bent piece of spring steel that could be inserted through a machine's coin chute. By manipulating the payout mechanism, users could trigger coin releases without winning legitimately.
Carmichael's story represents an entire era of slot cheating. He spent decades developing devices as slot machines evolved, constantly staying one step ahead of security improvements. When machines moved to electronic coins-out systems, he developed the "light wand"—a device that blinded the optical sensors counting payouts, causing machines to dispense coins without registering them.
The methods Carmichael used share some similarities with the insider approach taken by Ron Harris, who exploited his position as a gaming regulator to manipulate machines from the software side rather than the physical side.
The Top-Bottom Joint
Also known as a "slider," this simple device consisted of a wire with a bent end attached to a guitar string or metal tape. Inserted through the payout chute, it could manipulate older machines' coin mechanisms to trigger jackpots. While ineffective against modern machines, this device was responsible for millions in losses during the mechanical slot era.
EPROM Chip Manipulation
As slot machines became computerized, cheating methods adapted. Some organized groups would bribe or infiltrate casino staff to physically replace the EPROM chips that controlled machine payouts with modified versions. These replacement chips would trigger jackpots under specific conditions known only to the cheaters.
This method required significant resources and inside access, limiting it to sophisticated criminal operations. Modern machines use encrypted, tamper-evident chips and blockchain-style logging to prevent such modifications—security measures that emerged partly in response to the Ron Harris scandal.
Card Counting Devices
While card counting itself is not illegal (it's a skill, not cheating), using devices to assist with counting is a crime in every major gambling jurisdiction.
The Keith Taft Legacy
Keith Taft, an engineer and blackjack player, built increasingly sophisticated concealed computers designed to track cards and calculate optimal plays. His first device, "George," was a 15-pound behemoth hidden in his shoes. Later versions became progressively smaller and more capable.
Taft's computers could track every card dealt and calculate the exact optimal play and bet size for any situation. While skilled human card counters might achieve a 1-2% edge over the house, Taft's computers could theoretically achieve much higher advantages by never making calculation errors and tracking multiple decks simultaneously.
The legal situation around card counting devices helped establish important precedents in gaming law. Unlike pure card counting—which the MIT Blackjack Team demonstrated could be done effectively through mental skill alone—using electronic devices crosses a clear legal line that gaming regulators enforce vigorously.
How Casinos Fight Back
The ongoing battle between cheaters and casinos has driven remarkable advances in security technology. Today's casinos employ multi-layered defenses that make device-based cheating increasingly difficult.
| Cheating Method | Casino Countermeasure |
|---|---|
| Holdout devices | High-definition cameras, sleeve checks, controlled card handling procedures |
| Marked cards | Frequent deck changes, UV inspection, controlled storage, proprietary card designs |
| Roulette computers | Early "no more bets" calls, wheel modifications, RF detection equipment |
| Slot manipulation | Tamper-evident seals, encrypted chips, 24/7 electronic monitoring |
| Card counting devices | Continuous shuffling machines, betting pattern analysis, facial recognition |
Modern casino surveillance systems go far beyond simple cameras. AI-powered analysis can detect unusual betting patterns, identify known cheaters through facial recognition, and flag suspicious behavior for human review. Some systems can even detect the electromagnetic signatures of hidden electronic devices.
The Digital Frontier: Online Cheating Devices
As gambling has moved online, cheating devices have followed. Software-based "bots" can play poker for hours without fatigue, making optimal mathematical decisions. Some operate multiple accounts simultaneously, allowing a single operator to control an entire table.
Online casinos fight back with sophisticated detection systems. According to reports from eCOGRA (eCommerce Online Gaming Regulation and Assurance), a leading online gambling testing agency, detection methods include analyzing play patterns, tracking IP addresses and device fingerprints, and using AI to identify inhuman decision-making speeds or patterns.
Why the Arms Race Continues
Despite sophisticated countermeasures, the cheating device arms race shows no signs of ending. The fundamental economics make attempts inevitable: even small edges, consistently exploited, can produce substantial profits. And as technology advances, new vulnerabilities emerge alongside new security measures.
The history of cheating devices also reveals something about human nature—the same creativity and engineering skill that built these devices could have been applied to legitimate pursuits. Many former cheaters, like Tommy Glenn Carmichael, eventually redirected their talents toward helping casinos rather than exploiting them.
For casinos, the lesson is clear: security can never be considered "solved." Each new game and technology introduces potential vulnerabilities that determined cheaters will attempt to exploit. The house may always have the mathematical edge, but maintaining that edge requires constant vigilance against those who would try to tilt the odds through technological means.
Today, if you visit a major casino, you're protected by security measures developed in direct response to every device and technique described here. The cheaters' ingenuity, ironically, has helped create the heavily monitored, technologically sophisticated gaming environment that makes their own methods increasingly obsolete.
Related Stories: Ron Harris: The Insider Who Rigged Slots | The MIT Blackjack Team | How Casinos Track You | The Biggest Casino Heists